Decision Integrity method
The system must be able to stop itself.
Capability without authority boundaries, evidence and recovery is not autonomy. It is unmanaged consequence. Our method binds every consequential action to policy, provenance, verification and accountable human control.
Control plane
Five responsibilities surround the model.
Evidence and policy resolution
Bounded execution
Independent attestation
Escalation, recovery and learning
Release doctrine
Ten gates. No rescue by rhetoric.
These gates govern public claims and system design. Passing a gate does not prove the outcome. It proves the decision package met the stated control.
Claim gate
Every material claim maps to evidence or is labelled as inference.
Maturity gate
Concept, demonstrator, pilot and operating delivery are never collapsed.
Authority gate
The accountable human and override boundary remain explicit.
Conflict gate
Contradictory sources freeze confidence until reconciled.
Unknowns gate
Missing evidence produces unknown, not a plausible guess.
Anti-rescue gate
A failed claim cannot be saved by more persuasive wording.
Privacy gate
Personal and confidential information is minimised and controlled.
Regulatory gate
Patent, approval, endorsement and certification boundaries remain accurate.
Conversion gate
Every public page offers one relevant, proportionate next action.
Recovery gate
Systems and releases preserve rollback and post-result learning.
Core doctrine
What happened must be reconstructable without asking the system that produced it.
- Evidence survives explanation drift
- Authority survives agent delegation
- Recovery survives interrupted execution
- Evaluation survives pressure to approve
Decision evaluation
How should we pressure-test your next decision?
Tell us the decision owner, deadline, available evidence and cost of error. We will propose the smallest defensible next step.